Congregational? Presbyterian? Episcopalian? Presbygational? Conbypalian? Epigregyterian? I've heard them all (even made up a few myself).
"Its just as congregational as any other church," some argue. "We have a meeting of the whole church every quarter."
"No, it's Presbyterian" others say. "You have a group of pastors that makes decisions for multiple congregations."
But precisely because our people are bathed in trivial information in this day and age, they need a shepherd with real knowledge, much discernment, and a nose for truth.
Though I didn’t understand much of what I was reading I knew that I was reading “the words of eternal life.”
How strong are the biblical, theological, historical, and missional arguments used by advocates of multi-site churches?
What were my goals for the day? I wanted to begin shepherding the congregation.
Christianity, by which I mean church membership, is a participatory sport, not a spectator sport.
God’s desire is to reach the nations for his glory through church planting.
Seminaries are not made to make pastors. Churches make pastors.
Every Christian alive today is actively involved in contextualization.
Could there be an underlying theological disagreement about which authority actually shapes and informs methodological discussions?
My fears of the multi-site church movement are not technological; they are principled.
I want to offer six principles for partnering with overseas workers for the purpose of global evangelism.
But how should churches and missionaries decide whom to partner with?
If you love your children, you want them to be healthy. But if you love your children, you love them whether they are healthy or not.
In Zambia, the only free television channel that we have twenty-four hours a day is Trinity Broadcasting Network.